This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.
Issue #33 of i18nCore comments http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0606-its/ I can't see any good reason why one should omit the <rp> markup in Example 31, but I can see very good reasons for including it. Please add.
Action: working group to discuss and reply.
Resolution: working group agreed with the proposal at http://www.w3.org/2006/07/26-i18nits-minutes.html#item05. Action: editors to make the change.
Access to samples needed to implement the change
Action: Felix to make the change.
Wait: response sent. See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its/2006JulSep/0325.html
Closed. Commenters satisfied see: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its/2006JulSep/0362.html
Summary: The Working Group decided to accept the proposal and to add rp to the example.