This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.
Comment from Steven Pemperton / HTML WG, see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-i18n-comments/2006Jun/0002.html : This is a last call comment from the HTML WG. Please use XHTML Modularization for defining the DTD and Schema, since this allows easier integration into existing and new markup languages that use Modularization. We would be happy to provide help in producing the necessary modules. Best wishes, Steven Pemberton For the HTML WG
Added Steven to the CC list.
Felix had sent a reply already, asking for a reply until Friday 14 July, see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-html-wg/2006JulSep/0008.html . Since there was no reply, I will close this on Monday 17 July.
Is discussed at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its/2006JulSep/0061.html Action: working group to discuss and reply.
Discussed at http://www.w3.org/2006/07/24-i18nits-minutes.html#item04 . Action: The whole WG to look at the XHTML modularization comment and Felix reply proposal at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its/2006JulSep/0061.html
Closed. Now part of BP.
Summary: The Working Group decided to decline the change. The Working Group thinks that the comment does not apply, since the specification does not define schema modules.
Wait: reply sent. See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its/2006OctDec/0003.html .
Summary: The Working Group agreed to use XHTML Modularization to define an ITS DTD and Schemas in a separate document on "Best Practices for XML Internationalization".
Closed. Reviewer satisfied, see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-i18n-its/2006OctDec/0010.html .