This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 3254 - Consistency of document versions
Summary: Consistency of document versions
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: XML Schema
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Datatypes: XSD Part 2 (show other bugs)
Version: 1.1 only
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P2 normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
QA Contact: XML Schema comments list
URL:
Whiteboard: thimble, easy; do-it cluster
Keywords: resolved
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-05-09 11:12 UTC by Michael Kay
Modified: 2006-09-27 14:58 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:


Attachments

Description Michael Kay 2006-05-09 11:12:42 UTC
QT approved comment

In 3.3.7, The version of the document with change markings starts the section with a Note, which appears to be absent in the non-change-marked version.

(Also, it would be really helpful if the two versions used the same section numbering. I think we achieve this for the QT specs.)
Comment 1 Dave Peterson 2006-05-22 00:55:12 UTC
(In reply to comment #0)

> In 3.3.7, The version of the document with change markings starts the section
> with a Note, which appears to be absent in the non-change-marked version.

The note should be deleted from both version.

> (Also, it would be really helpful if the two versions used the same section
> numbering. I think we achieve this for the QT specs.)

Interesting.  Not possible with the existing XSLT.  Should the new version retain the
old numbering for all old sections?  This could lead to non-uniform numbering in
the new n-c-m version.
Comment 2 Dave Peterson 2006-09-27 14:50:34 UTC
The markup has been corrected so that the Note in question is shown as deleted in the diff version of the status quo document.

Please let us know that you agree with this resolution of your issue, 
by adding a comment to the issue record and changing the Status of 
the issue to Closed.  (Or, if you do not agree with this resolution, 
please add a comment explaining why. If you wish to appeal the WG's 
decision to the Director, then also change the Status of the record 
to Reopened. If you wish to record your dissent, but do not wish to 
appeal the decision to the Director, then change the Status of the 
record to Closed.)  If we do not hear from you in the next two weeks, 
we will assume you agree with the WG decision.
Comment 3 Michael Kay 2006-09-27 14:58:48 UTC
Fine.