This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 3223 - Literals in the value space?
Summary: Literals in the value space?
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: XML Schema
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Datatypes: XSD Part 2 (show other bugs)
Version: 1.1 only
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P2 normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
QA Contact: XML Schema comments list
URL:
Whiteboard: thimble, easy
Keywords: resolved
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-05-09 09:40 UTC by Michael Kay
Modified: 2006-09-27 18:01 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:


Attachments

Description Michael Kay 2006-05-09 09:40:52 UTC
QT approved comment

Section 2.2.1, in the WARNING note, the phrase "neither [literal] is in
the value space" seems odd. No literal is ever in a value space; I think the
intended meaning is that neither literal is the canonical representation of
any value in the value space.
Comment 1 Dave Peterson 2006-05-09 16:37:22 UTC
(In reply to comment #0)

> Section 2.2.1, in the WARNING note, the phrase "neither [literal] is in
> the value space" seems odd. No literal is ever in a value space; I think the
> intended meaning is that neither literal is the canonical representation of
> any value in the value space.

It should read "neither 0.1 nor 0.10000000009 is in the value space".  (I
suspect that the canonical representation of the value to which '0.1' maps
is in fact '0.1', but that's not the point.)
Comment 2 Dave Peterson 2006-09-26 03:19:18 UTC
The WG has approved the following rewording:  "The ·literals· '0.1' and '0.10000000009' map to the same value in float (neither 0.1 nor 0.10000000009 is in the value space, and each ·literal· is mapped..."  It will be placed into the status quo document.
Comment 3 Dave Peterson 2006-09-27 17:47:48 UTC
The approved rewording is now in the status quo document.

Please let us know that you agree with this resolution of your issue, 
by adding a comment to the issue record and changing the Status of 
the issue to Closed.  (Or, if you do not agree with this resolution, 
please add a comment explaining why. If you wish to appeal the WG's 
decision to the Director, then also change the Status of the record 
to Reopened. If you wish to record your dissent, but do not wish to 
appeal the decision to the Director, then change the Status of the 
record to Closed.)  If we do not hear from you in the next two weeks, 
we will assume you agree with the WG decision.
Comment 4 Michael Kay 2006-09-27 18:01:17 UTC
OK