This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 3114 - Are explicit dependencies required?
Summary: Are explicit dependencies required?
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: XML Processing Model
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Pipeline language (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC Linux
: P2 normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Norman Walsh
QA Contact:
URL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/p...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-04-12 12:21 UTC by Norman Walsh
Modified: 2011-02-23 20:27 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:

Attachments

Description Norman Walsh 2006-04-12 12:21:17 UTC 
Do we need to allow two steps to explicitly indicate that one depends on the previous execution of the other?
Comment 1 Innovimax 2006-04-13 09:25:08 UTC 
I think we should allow the XProc language to precise this case
The main point i see now is for error handling
If we know that two step which could be done in whatever order, but one could give error earlier than the other, we should be able to indicate it

In that special case, specifying priority is sufficient