This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.
Do we need to allow two steps to explicitly indicate that one depends on the previous execution of the other?
I think we should allow the XProc language to precise this case The main point i see now is for error handling If we know that two step which could be done in whatever order, but one could give error earlier than the other, we should be able to indicate it In that special case, specifying priority is sufficient