This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.
In both the latest public draft and the latest internal draft of F+O 3.1. The example given for map:for-each mentions map:for-each-entry twice. I think the name was most likely changed from map:for-each-entry to map:for-each and the replacement missed, is that correct?
The fix was deemed editorial and has been applied.
Sadly the fix didn't make it into the XSLT 3.0 version of map:for-each, which still has two references in examples to map:for-each-entry.
The fix has now been applied to the XSLT 3.0 spec. No change log entry.
*** Bug 29504 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 29505 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***