29258 – [QT3TS] omitted Expr in EnclosedExpr

This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 29258 - [QT3TS] omitted Expr in EnclosedExpr

Summary: [QT3TS] omitted Expr in EnclosedExpr

Status:	RESOLVED FIXED

Alias:	None

Product:	XPath / XQuery / XSLT
Classification:	Unclassified
Component:	XQuery 3 & XPath 3 Test Suite (show other bugs)
Version:	Candidate Recommendation
Hardware:	All All

Importance:	P2 normal
Target Milestone:	---
Assignee:	O'Neil Delpratt
QA Contact:	Mailing list for public feedback on specs from XSL and XML Query WGs

URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2015-11-03 16:38 UTC by Michael Dyck
Modified:	2016-03-09 22:54 UTC (History)
CC List:	3 users (show)

See Also:

Attachments

Description Michael Dyck 2015-11-03 16:38:01 UTC

In the resolution of Bug 29185, XQuery 3.1 has changed {Expr} to {Expr?} at various points in the grammar. So a few tests that were illegal in older versions are legal in XQuery 3.1. Consequently, the following tests should be split into 3.1 and pre-3.1 versions, with different expectations:

     prod/CompCommentConstructor.xml#K2-ComputeConComment-4
     prod/CompTextConstructor.xml#K2-ConText-5
     prod/UnorderedExpr.xml#K-OrderExpr-1
     prod/UnorderedExpr.xml#K-OrderExpr-2
     misc/CombinedErrorCodes.xml#K-CombinedErrorCodes-13
     misc/CombinedErrorCodes.xml#K-CombinedErrorCodes-14
     misc/CombinedErrorCodes.xml#K-CombinedErrorCodes-15

Comment 1 Josh Spiegel 2015-11-06 17:52:38 UTC

Also this one:
prod/DirElemContent.xml#K2-DirectConElemContent-26

Comment 2 Michael Dyck 2015-11-06 21:57:12 UTC

(In reply to Josh Spiegel from comment #1)
> Also this one:
> prod/DirElemContent.xml#K2-DirectConElemContent-26

No, K2-DirectConElemContent-26 is only for XQ10 and XQ30.
The XQ31+ version is K2-DirectConElemContent-26a

Comment 3 Josh Spiegel 2015-11-06 22:36:26 UTC

Yes, you are right. I was looking at the github mirror (https://github.com/LeoWoerteler/QT3TS) which appears to have stopped updating back in October.  This test was fixed recently.

Comment 4 Christian Gruen 2015-12-02 10:33:04 UTC

(In reply to Josh Spiegel from comment #3)
> Yes, you are right. I was looking at the github mirror
> (https://github.com/LeoWoerteler/QT3TS) which appears to have stopped
> updating back in October.

Thanks for the reminder. Since today, the mirror is updated again.

Comment 5 Josh Spiegel 2015-12-02 17:24:26 UTC

Thanks! I have found it very useful when searching for tests and looking at change history.

Comment 6 O'Neil Delpratt 2015-12-15 16:01:02 UTC

I have added new test case which are variants of the ones suggested in comment #0. Committed to cvs

Comment 7 Michael Kay 2016-03-09 22:54:17 UTC

I have corrected the expected results of

prod/CompCommentConstructor.xml#K2-ComputeConComment-4

(It should produce a comment with zero-length content. For some reason text{} produces an empty sequence but comment{} produces a zero-length comment node.)