This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 2883 - Reword reference to "Localization Properties" in "Out-of-scope" section
Summary: Reword reference to "Localization Properties" in "Out-of-scope" section
Alias: None
Product: ITS
Classification: Unclassified
Component: ITS tagset (show other bugs)
Version: WorkingDraft
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P2 normal
Target Milestone: LastCall20May
Assignee: Felix Sasaki
QA Contact: Felix Sasaki
Depends on:
Reported: 2006-02-15 11:22 UTC by Christian Lieske
Modified: 2006-07-24 09:06 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:


Description Christian Lieske 2006-02-15 11:22:27 UTC
Comment 1 Christian Lieske 2006-02-16 09:59:24 UTC
I suggest a different way to talk about "XML Localization Properties"
since to me the existing one might be to abstract:

This standard does does not cover exhaustively cover all mechanisms and
data formats which might  be needed for configuring XML localization
workflows or tools. These mechanisms and data format, sometimes called
XML Localization Properties, however, possibly may be implemented by the
framework put forth in this standard. In particular, Section 3:
Selection of ITS information may provide valuable ideas.

FS> not implemented, since it seems to me that the localization property
issue has no common understanding in the group yet. 
Comment 2 Yves Savourel 2006-03-29 16:58:32 UTC
In order to close this issue we need to make sure everyone is on the same wave length about "XML localization properties". This is one of the discussion topic for this week.

My definition of the term "XML localization properties" (I think in accord with Christian's) would be something like:

"XML localization properties" is a generic term to name the mechanisms and data formats that allows localization tools to be configured in order to process a specific XML format. Example of "XML localization properties" are: the "Trados DTD Settings" file, the SDLX "Analysis" file.

So I would agree with Christian's wording (after removing one 'cover' and one 'does' from the first line).

Comment 3 Yves Savourel 2006-04-07 19:42:13 UTC
Christian's text is integrated in the latest draft.

Comment 4 Felix Sasaki 2006-07-24 09:03:57 UTC
Closed, no further action necessary.
Comment 5 Felix Sasaki 2006-07-24 09:06:51 UTC
This is a test if the QA contact change worked.