This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 28707 - Gloups! I did not know this feedback would be public! Can you delete my e-mail address in the issues 28705 and 28706, please?
Summary: Gloups! I did not know this feedback would be public! Can you delete my e-mai...
Status: VERIFIED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: WHATWG
Classification: Unclassified
Component: HTML (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Other other
: P3 normal
Target Milestone: Unsorted
Assignee: Ian 'Hixie' Hickson
QA Contact: contributor
URL: https://html.spec.whatwg.org/#the-rea...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2015-05-28 02:42 UTC by contributor
Modified: 2015-05-28 05:01 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:

Attachments

Description contributor 2015-05-28 02:42:30 UTC 
Specification: https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/forms.html
Multipage: https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/#the-readonly-attribute
Complete: https://html.spec.whatwg.org/#the-readonly-attribute
Referrer: https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/common-input-element-attributes.html

Comment:
Gloups ! I did not know this feedback would be public ! Can you delete my
e-mail address in https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28706 and
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28705 ? Please, I hate spam.
Thank you. Nicolas B. 

Posted from: 81.57.201.53
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/38.0
Comment 1 Michael[tm] Smith 2015-05-28 02:47:33 UTC 
(In reply to contributor from comment #0)
> Gloups ! I did not know this feedback would be public ! Can you delete my
> e-mail address in https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28706 and
> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28705 ?

No, actually, we can't delete any part of that. Bugzilla doesn't work that way.
Comment 2 Nicolas Barbulesco 2015-05-28 03:49:02 UTC 
(Thank you Michael for your so quick reply!

In reply to Michael[tm] Smith from comment #1)

> (In reply to contributor from comment #0)
> > Gloups ! I did not know this feedback would be public ! Can you delete my
> > e-mail address in https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28706 and
> > https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28705 ?
> 
> No, actually, we can't delete any part of that. Bugzilla doesn't work that
> way.

I have edited the subject of these issues, now. I had to register for that! But the descriptions still need to be edited. I think this can be done. In Bugzilla this is a matter of permissions. At worst, can the issues be deleted? Hidden for the public? Like sensitive security issues.
Comment 3 Michael[tm] Smith 2015-05-28 04:09:35 UTC 
(In reply to Nicolas Barbulesco from comment #2)
> (Thank you Michael for your so quick reply!
> 
> In reply to Michael[tm] Smith from comment #1)
> 
> > (In reply to contributor from comment #0)
> > > Gloups ! I did not know this feedback would be public ! Can you delete my
> > > e-mail address in https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28706 and
> > > https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=28705 ?
> > 
> > No, actually, we can't delete any part of that. Bugzilla doesn't work that
> > way.
> 
> I have edited the subject of these issues, now. I had to register for that!
> But the descriptions still need to be edited. I think this can be done.

It can't, actually.

> In Bugzilla this is a matter of permissions.

I have bugzilla admin perms but I can't delete permissions.

> At worst, can the issues be deleted? Hidden for the public?

As far as I can see the bugzilla admin interface provides not way to delete bugzilla bugs nor to hide them.

> Like sensitive security issues.

It's not a sensitive security issue...
Comment 4 Michael[tm] Smith 2015-05-28 04:24:48 UTC 
Figured out a way to delete the bugs
Comment 5 Nicolas Barbulesco 2015-05-28 04:48:35 UTC 
Thanks a lot, Michael! 
The problem is solved now. 
Yet another victory of man over machine!
Comment 6 Michael[tm] Smith 2015-05-28 05:01:58 UTC 
(In reply to Nicolas Barbulesco from comment #5)
> Thanks a lot, Michael! 
> The problem is solved now. 
> Yet another victory of man over machine!

Indeed