This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.
This issue was originally reported by Michael Sperberg-McQueen. We need to be clear where the XML Schema spec depends on component identity. We need a language to talk about identity of types, in general, and particularly with respect to anonymous types. Can an inherited type have an anonymous type? Are anonymous types that appear multiple types in a model group the same type? See (member-only link) minutes of 10/24 telcon (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2002Oct/0248.html). This item was discussed, and phase-1 agreement was reached, in the meeting of 2004-05-13 (http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/05/xml-schema-ftf-minutes.html). According to the requirements document, phase-1 agreement has been reached.
Postponed per minutes http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2007Mar/0010.html