This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 28276 - [XP3.1] 2 Basics "atomic type?"
Summary: [XP3.1] 2 Basics "atomic type?"
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT
Classification: Unclassified
Component: XPath 3.1 (show other bugs)
Version: Candidate Recommendation
Hardware: PC Linux
: P2 minor
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jonathan Robie
QA Contact: Mailing list for public feedback on specs from XSL and XML Query WGs
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2015-03-23 00:26 UTC by Patrick Durusau
Modified: 2015-07-10 21:28 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:


Attachments

Description Patrick Durusau 2015-03-23 00:26:06 UTC
2 Basics

3rd paragraph:

"[Definition: An atomic value is a value in the value space of an atomic type, as defined in [XML Schema 1.0] or [XML Schema 1.1].]"

XML Schema 1.0 - "Atomic type" appears once in part 1, 3.14.1, which is marked as non-normative.


XML Schema 1.1 "Atomic type appears once in part 1, 3.16.1, which is a normative section.

The lack of structure prevents more exact referencing. 

Atomic type does not appear at all in part 2 of either XML Schema 1.0 or 1.1 (If you are thinking of anyAtomicType, close but no prize)
Comment 1 Michael Kay 2015-03-23 08:39:38 UTC
XSD 1.1 part 2 calls them "atomic datatypes" and in a note says that "type" and "datatype" are synonymous.
Comment 2 Jonathan Robie 2015-07-10 21:28:40 UTC
I agree with Mike Kay.  I believe this is editorial, and I don't see a way to improve this editorially, so I'm closing this.