This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 2821 - RQ-122 Define value space for dateTime more precisely (dateTime-values)
Summary: RQ-122 Define value space for dateTime more precisely (dateTime-values)
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: XML Schema
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Datatypes: XSD Part 2 (show other bugs)
Version: 1.1 only
Hardware: Other All
: P2 normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
QA Contact: XML Schema comments list
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: resolved
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-02-11 00:30 UTC by C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
Modified: 2008-03-08 15:01 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:


Attachments

Description C. M. Sperberg-McQueen 2006-02-11 00:30:08 UTC
This issue was originally reported by Dave Peterson.


The definition of the dateTime value space does not reference a part

of ISO 8601 that defines dateTime values, only lexical

representations. The reference should be corrected, and the

recommendation should explain or fix the fuzziness and/or gaps in the

definitions referenced.


Dave P: "In 3.2.7 we assert that "the value space of

dateTime is the space of Conbinations of date and time of day values

as defined in [Clause] 5.4 of ISO 8601".  I notice also that

Clause 5 of 8601 is titled "Representations" and the first

sentence of Clause 5.4 asserts "a time-point can be identified

through a combination of date and time of the day representations

provided for in this International Standard". From this, I

conclude our reference is at best incorrect, since the referenced text

only addresses standardized lexical representations."


"It is clear from our discussions that we do not equate dateTime

values with lexical representations thereof; the mapping is not

1-1."


See (member-only link)

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2002Oct/0258.html

(http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2002Oct/0258.html).


Dave Peterson (member-only link)

(http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2002Oct/att-0363/00-part)


Approved for addition in Chapel Hill:

http://www.w3.org/XML/2002/10/xml-schema-ftf-minutes#xs11.3111

(http://www.w3.org/XML/2002/10/xml-schema-ftf-minutes#xs11.3111)


This may have been solved by accepting Dave Peterson's proposal for

R-120 erratum for R-120 (member-only link)

(http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2002Oct/att-0363/00-part)


This item was discussed in the meeting of 2003-09-17

(http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2003/09/xml-schema-ftf-minutes.html)


This item was discussed in the meeting of 2004-03-01

(http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/03/xml-schema-ftf-minutes.html#xsd1.1)


Proposal:


Dave Peterson erratum for R-120 (member-only link)

(http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2002Oct/att-0363/00-part)


-----


This requirement was discharged by the inclusion of the so-called

'seven-property model' in the first published Working Draft of XML

Schema 1.1.