This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.
R-181 Request concerning Part 2 Transition history raised on 18 May 2005 by Stefan Wachter (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ xmlschema-dev/2002Nov/0066.html) agreed on 19 May 2005 (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-wg/ 2005May/att-0024/ Minutes_of_the_W3C_XML_Schema_Working_Group_5th__38th__F2F_meeting.htm) Datatype editor to resolve R-181 by defining identity and equality of lists in terms of pairwise member identity and equality, respectively. Acknowledgment cycle Not started Action history Part 2 Editors accepted on 19 May 2005 (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-wg/ 2005May/att-0024/ Minutes_of_the_W3C_XML_Schema_Working_Group_5th__38th__F2F_meeting.htm) DT editors to prepare an editorial proposal to resolve wd-34 by defining identity and equality of lists in terms of pairwise member identity and equality, respectively.
At the face to face meeting of January 2006 in St. Petersburg, the Working Group decided not to take further action on this issue in XML Schema 1.1. (This issue was not discussed separately; it was one of those which were dispatched by a blanket decision that all other open issues would be closed without action, unless raised again in last-call comments.) Some members of the Working Group expressed regret over not being able to resolve all the issues dealt with in this way, but on the whole the Working Group felt it better not to delay Datatypes 1.1 in order to resolve all of them. This issue should have been marked as RESOLVED /WONTFIX at that time, but apparently was not. I am marking it that way now, to reduce confusion.