This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.
in part 2 is at best misleading wrt lists and unions -- their {base type definition} cannot be any datatype, as is implied by the table, rather for unions is aST or another union, for lists its aST or another list. Editorial concerning Part 2 Simple Type Definition (Part 2) Schema Component Constraint: applicable facets Transition history raised on 7 Jan 2005 by Henry S. Thompson (ht@inf.ed.ac.uk) (http://lists.w3. org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2005JanMar/0000.html)
Editorial proposal: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2005Jun/att-0020/wd23. html__charset_ISO-8859-1 Proposal accepted as amended: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2005Jun/0080.html