This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 2737 - wd-5: Editorial comments
Summary: wd-5: Editorial comments
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: XML Schema
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Datatypes: XSD Part 2 (show other bugs)
Version: 1.1 only
Hardware: PC Windows XP
: P2 normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
QA Contact: XML Schema comments list
URL: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-01-20 20:59 UTC by Mary Holstege
Modified: 2006-01-20 22:37 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:

Attachments

Description Mary Holstege 2006-01-20 20:59:37 UTC 
I don't see the value of pointing out that equality is a congruence relation. 
The only other occurrence of "congruence" is in the appendices that define it.

I don't see what the first occurrence of "on the other hand" is referring to as 
the first hand.

as in the Order section, we should define the '=' notation before using it 
instead of the other way around.

I think you explained it, but I still find confusing, "there is one equality 
relation for all values of all datatypes"

raised on 7 Apr 2004 by Xan Gregg (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-
schema-ig/2004Jun/0295.html)
agreed on 19 Nov 2004 (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/
2004Nov/0100.html)

Assign to editors to fix
Acknowledgment cycle
Not started
Action history
Part 2 Editors
accepted on 19 Nov 2004 (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/
2004Nov/0100.html)


Editors to attempt to resolve wd-5 in the next working draft