This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.
References should be consistently written as [REF] in square brackets. References need to be correctly categorized as normative or informative.
So, it needs to be clarified The [REF] form is for referring to the short-hand identifier of a spec that appears within the references section. However, there are still times where we want to say the full part of the specification. Something like "Refer to Section 3 of PKCS #11 [PKCS11]" Presumably
(In reply to Ryan Sleevi from comment #1) > So, it needs to be clarified > > The [REF] form is for referring to the short-hand identifier of a spec that > appears within the references section. However, there are still times where > we want to say the full part of the specification. > > Something like > > "Refer to Section 3 of PKCS #11 [PKCS11]" > > Presumably I would say "Refer to Section 3 of [PKCS11]"
In order to progress towards exit to Last Call for the Web Crypto API, the chair suggests the following resolution for that bug. Resolution : Bug RESOLVED, editors will edit the specification to harmonize with consistent usage of specification references and/or section of specification reference. If none objects before the 20th of Oct @20:00 UTC, this resolution will be endorsed.
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/webcrypto-api/rev/586d852d2679