This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 24700 - Should 'foo' be entirely equivalent to [ 'foo-primary', 'foo-secondary' ]
Summary: Should 'foo' be entirely equivalent to [ 'foo-primary', 'foo-secondary' ]
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: WebAppsWG
Classification: Unclassified
Component: HISTORICAL - Screen Orientation (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Hardware: All All
: P2 normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Mounir Lamouri
QA Contact: public-webapps-bugzilla
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2014-02-17 16:29 UTC by Mounir Lamouri
Modified: 2014-03-14 20:25 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:

Attachments

Description Mounir Lamouri 2014-02-17 16:29:45 UTC 
In other words, if the UA does not allow to lock to portrait-secondary, should a lock to 'portrait' fail or succeed?