This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 24363 - Is rfc2119 "required" intended here?
Summary: Is rfc2119 "required" intended here?
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: WHATWG
Classification: Unclassified
Component: HTML (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Other other
: P3 normal
Target Milestone: Unsorted
Assignee: Ian 'Hixie' Hickson
QA Contact: contributor
URL: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2014-01-22 16:10 UTC by contributor
Modified: 2014-01-27 23:55 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:

Attachments

Description contributor 2014-01-22 16:10:05 UTC 
Specification: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/the-video-element.html
Multipage: http://www.whatwg.org/C#dom-media-pause
Complete: http://www.whatwg.org/c#dom-media-pause
Referrer: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/

Comment:
Is rfc2119 "required" intended here?

Posted from: 94.234.170.72 by simonp@opera.com
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_9_1) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/32.0.1700.76 Safari/537.36 OPR/19.0.1326.39 (Edition Next)
Comment 1 contributor 2014-01-27 23:55:28 UTC 
Checked in as WHATWG revision r8426.
Check-in comment: Audit use of 'required'.
http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=8425&to=8426