This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 24319 - Should interface objects for objects that survive structured clone be exposed? Or should those things have to say "exposed to JavaScript" explicitly?
Summary: Should interface objects for objects that survive structured clone be exposed...
Status: RESOLVED WORKSFORME
Alias: None
Product: WHATWG
Classification: Unclassified
Component: HTML (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Other other
: P3 normal
Target Milestone: Unsorted
Assignee: Ian 'Hixie' Hickson
QA Contact: contributor
URL: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2014-01-17 13:00 UTC by contributor
Modified: 2014-04-11 18:28 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:

Attachments

Description contributor 2014-01-17 13:00:10 UTC 
Specification: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/workers.html
Multipage: http://www.whatwg.org/C#interface-objects-and-constructors
Complete: http://www.whatwg.org/c#interface-objects-and-constructors
Referrer: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/

Comment:
Should interface objects for objects that survive structured clone be exposed?
Or should those things have to say "exposed to JavaScript" explicitly?

Posted from: 90.230.218.37 by simonp@opera.com
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_9_1) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/32.0.1700.68 Safari/537.36 OPR/19.0.1326.26 (Edition Next)
Comment 1 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson 2014-01-17 18:39:23 UTC 
Yeah I need to define all this. It's waiting on bug 22646.
Comment 2 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson 2014-04-11 18:28:41 UTC 
Looks like this is good now.