This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 23699 - "time after that truncation" is potentially confusing. The time resulting from the truncation ("after" applying the truncation) or the millisecond "after" the truncated value. e.g. .023045 would result in .024
Summary: "time after that truncation" is potentially confusing. The time resulting fro...
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: WHATWG
Classification: Unclassified
Component: HTML (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Other other
: P3 normal
Target Milestone: Unsorted
Assignee: Ian 'Hixie' Hickson
QA Contact: contributor
URL: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2013-11-01 11:48 UTC by contributor
Modified: 2013-11-01 22:58 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:

Attachments

Description contributor 2013-11-01 11:48:43 UTC 
Specification: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/infrastructure.html
Multipage: http://www.whatwg.org/C#dependencies
Complete: http://www.whatwg.org/c#dependencies
Referrer: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/

Comment:
"time after that truncation" is potentially confusing. The time resulting from
the truncation ("after" applying the truncation) or the millisecond "after"
the truncated value. e.g. .023045 would result in .024

Posted from: 76.99.16.216
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_8_5) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/31.0.1650.34 Safari/537.36
Comment 1 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson 2013-11-01 22:58:18 UTC 
Well observed. Fixed. Thanks.