This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.
In "8.7.7 The draggable attribute", the second-last paragraph says: Otherwise, the draggable DOM must return false. Change "DOM" to "IDL attribute". Also, I believe this paragraph should be joined to the previous paragraph, since it appears to be within that paragraph's 'scope'.
It's part of the chain that the previous three paragraphs form, it's not just for the previous one.
Checked in as WHATWG revision r7925. Check-in comment: Fix some typos or copypasta. http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=7924&to=7925
(In reply to comment #1) > It's part of the chain that the previous three paragraphs form, it's not > just for the previous one. I don't see how that can be. The previous three paragraphs are: 1. If X has the state /true/, ... 2. Otherwise, if X has the state /false/, ... 3. Otherwise, X has the state /auto/. ... Those exhaust the possibilities for X -- the element's draggable content attribute must have one of those three states. Para 3 acknowledges this by making an *assertion* about X's state, rather than testing it. So there *is* no "otherwise" that can logically extend that chain. Instead, the only logical place for: Otherwise, the draggable DOM must return false. is at the end of para 3. (I.e., as the "else" to "If the element is an img element, or, if the element is an a element with an href content attribute".) (If para 3 were Otherwise, IF X has the state /auto/ AND the element is .... return true. then the final "Otherwise" would make sense where it is.)
Checked in as WHATWG revision r8059. Check-in comment: Make this prose about draggable='' make more sense. http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=8058&to=8059
Yeah, fair enough. Thanks,