This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.
The following paragraph 2.4.1. mentions that union types are the union of "one or more other datatypes": http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema11-2/#atomic-vs-list While the definition of such types allow for "zero or more" (which allows "user-defining" xs:error): http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema11-2/#union-datatypes Did I just miss something, or could it be a typo in paragraph 2.4.1.?