(endorsed by the i18n WG)
4.6.20 The ruby element
"A single ruby element, but with no further ruby element descendants"
Does this mean that you can't have a ruby element and additional characters alongside it? For example, since multiple annotations don't always refer to the same sequences of characters, it would be important to ensure you could do the following:
This should result in the rendered text where the hiragana is mono-ruby pronunciation that refers only to the first kanji character, and the katakana is group-ruby that refers to the kanji+hiragana base characters together.
I think that it is clear how this should be parsed, but it must be allowed by the rules in the spec.
Is the fix in the WHATWG patch satisfactory?
Looks good to me. Thanks.
EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If
you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of
this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would
like the Editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would
like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please
add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and
text for the Tracker Issue; or you may create a Tracker Issue
yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this
Rationale: Adopted WHATWG patch
I18N is satisfied by these changes. Thank you.