This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 1903 - RQ21: BNF, regex, etc for boolean
Summary: RQ21: BNF, regex, etc for boolean
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: XML Schema
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Datatypes: XSD Part 2 (show other bugs)
Version: 1.1 only
Hardware: PC Linux
: P2 major
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: XML Schema WG
QA Contact: XML Schema comments list
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords: resolved
Depends on:
Blocks: 1837
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2005-08-30 16:05 UTC by C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
Modified: 2008-03-05 13:46 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:


Attachments

Description C. M. Sperberg-McQueen 2005-08-30 16:05:15 UTC
As part of discharging RQ-21 (provide regex and/or BNF for all primitive
types), define a BNF and/or regex, lexical mapping, and canonical
mapping for xsd:boolean.

A proposal for wording to accomplish this is part of an omnibus proposal
at http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xmlschema-2/datatypes.omnibus.20050824.html
Comment 1 C. M. Sperberg-McQueen 2005-09-07 22:15:08 UTC
The proposal for Boolean has been made included in the omnibus package
of 31 August 2005.
http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xmlschema-2/datatypes.omnibus.20050831.html

On 2 September 2005, the WG agreed to some amendments to the proposal
as put forward 31 August.  

  - In the first sentence of the section, for "supports binary-valued 
    logic" read "represents the values of two-valued logic".
  - For "binary-valued logic" read "two-valued logic" passim.
  - Remove the sentence defining the obvious regular expression
    for the lexical space.

Final action will be taken when the WG acts on the omnibus package.
Comment 2 C. M. Sperberg-McQueen 2005-12-09 00:59:05 UTC
This issue involved changes in sections 3.3.2 of the Datatypes
specification; the Working Group approved that part of the
omnibus proposal of 31 August at its meeting in Edinburgh
in September.  
Comment 3 C. M. Sperberg-McQueen 2005-12-09 03:52:25 UTC
The approved text was integrated into the status quo document
on 8 December 2005.
Comment 4 Dave Peterson 2008-03-05 13:46:00 UTC
Although no formal request for closure was made, since the reporter also noted the resolution of this bug over two years ago, I'm marking it closed.