This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 18643 - should 'annotF001' be valid?
Summary: should 'annotF001' be valid?
Status: NEW
Alias: None
Product: XML Schema Test Suite
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Microsoft tests (show other bugs)
Version: 2006-11-06
Hardware: All Windows 3.1
: P2 normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
QA Contact: XML Schema Test Suite mailing list
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2012-08-21 15:15 UTC by Altova XML Developers
Modified: 2012-12-04 00:54 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:

Attachments

Description Altova XML Developers 2012-08-21 15:15:50 UTC 
I think test 'annotF001' of set 'MS-Annotations2006-07-15' should be valid. The empty string is a legal value for xml:lang (see http://www.w3.org/2001/xml.xsd#att_lang).

Best regards,
Andreas Meissl