This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 1838 - RQ-152: Should XML Schema 1.1 be aligned with XML 1.1?
Summary: RQ-152: Should XML Schema 1.1 be aligned with XML 1.1?
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: XML Schema
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Datatypes: XSD Part 2 (show other bugs)
Version: 1.1 only
Hardware: PC Linux
: P2 critical
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
QA Contact: XML Schema comments list
URL: http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2002/07/x...
Whiteboard:
Keywords: resolved
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2005-08-09 19:39 UTC by C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
Modified: 2008-03-08 14:17 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:


Attachments

Description C. M. Sperberg-McQueen 2005-08-09 19:39:01 UTC
Requirement:  specify relation of XML Schema 1.1 to XML 1.1.
(For full description see entry in old 1.1 requirements list
at http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2002/07/xmlschema-1.1-current-reqs-list.html#xml1.1)

The WG decided in May 2005 to align XML Schema 1.1 with XML 1.1;
in July, a WG member asked to reopen the decision
(http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2005Jul/0046.html).
Comment 1 C. M. Sperberg-McQueen 2006-01-28 18:06:06 UTC
On 27 January 2006 the WG adopted a proposal to make it
implementation-defined whether schema software supports
the XML- and Namespaces-dependent types using the definitions
of NCName, Char, etc. found in 1.0 of those specifications,
or the definitions found in 1.1, or both.  Similarly,
when schema validity assessors read XML as input (as
opposed to DOM trees or some other representation of the
infoset, where version information may be unavailable),
support for 1.0, 1.1, or both is implementation defined.

In the case of the datatypes, it is recommended that 
the choice of which flavor of the datatypes to use should be 
under user control.  In the case of XML input, it is
said only that the choice may be under user control.

The WG also agreed that we should augment the PSVI to
show which version of the relevant types was used; that
will be tracked in another issue.
Comment 2 C. M. Sperberg-McQueen 2006-06-26 12:04:09 UTC
The underlying issue applies to both Structures and Datatypes.  
This Bugzilla entry is for Datatypes; see bug 3048 for the
entry for Structures.