This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 18269 - This should be explicit that this means the ISO 8601 week number. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_8601#Week_dates
Summary: This should be explicit that this means the ISO 8601 week number. http://en....
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: HTML WG
Classification: Unclassified
Component: HTML5 spec (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Other other
: P3 normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: This bug has no owner yet - up for the taking
QA Contact: HTML WG Bugzilla archive list
URL: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2012-07-18 17:54 UTC by contributor
Modified: 2012-09-28 05:32 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

See Also:

Attachments

Description contributor 2012-07-18 17:54:16 UTC 
This was was cloned from bug 17642 as part of operation convergence.
Originally filed: 2012-06-28 19:22:00 +0000

================================================================================
 #0   contributor@whatwg.org                          2012-06-28 19:22:30 +0000 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Specification: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/common-microsyntaxes.html
Multipage: http://www.whatwg.org/C#weeks
Complete: http://www.whatwg.org/c#weeks

Comment:
This should be explicit that this means the ISO 8601 week number. 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_8601#Week_dates

Posted from: 67.180.233.222
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686) AppleWebKit/536.5 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/19.0.1084.52 Safari/536.5
================================================================================
Comment 1 Robin Berjon 2012-09-11 14:29:45 UTC 
EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are
satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If
you have additional information and would like the Editor to reconsider, please
reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML
Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest
title and text for the Tracker Issue; or you may create a Tracker Issue
yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:

   http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html

Status: Accepted
Change Description: Added a note to this effect.
Rationale: It can't hurt, and it might help a reader to understand that this definition is not pulled out of a hat.

https://github.com/w3c/html/commit/02e34ad
Comment 2 Silvia Pfeiffer 2012-09-22 09:05:45 UTC 
Ian's spec has fixes this bug in this patch:
https://github.com/w3c/html/commit/86afe1e2a7fb7c446b4ae4648f4d5263bd81d8a3

Should we add this, too?
Comment 3 Robin Berjon 2012-09-25 10:05:00 UTC 
(In reply to comment #2)
> Ian's spec has fixes this bug in this patch:
> https://github.com/w3c/html/commit/86afe1e2a7fb7c446b4ae4648f4d5263bd81d8a3
> 
> Should we add this, too?

Yes please!
Comment 4 Silvia Pfeiffer 2012-09-28 05:32:30 UTC 
EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If
you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of
this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would
like the Editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would
like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please
add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and
text for the Tracker Issue; or you may create a Tracker Issue
yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this
document:   http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html

Status: Accepted
Change Description: merged patch
https://github.com/w3c/html/commit/86afe1e2a7fb7c446b4ae4648f4d5263bd81d8a3
Rationale: merged resolution by WHATWG to avoid forking further