Bugzilla – Bug 18003
Change use of "relevant namespace object" term re workers
Last modified: 2012-09-14 16:58:25 UTC
This was was cloned from bug 15158 as part of operation convergence.
Originally filed: 2011-12-12 23:32:00 +0000
#0 firstname.lastname@example.org 2011-12-12 23:32:12 +0000
Now that the "relevant namespace object" term has gone from Web IDL (since
modules have been removed) some text around here needs to be rewritten. You
probably want to refer to you don't need to mention the ECMAScript global
object specifically, but instead you might want to refer to Web IDL's
#dfn-expose, which can be used to control which interfaces are exposed in a
particular ECMAScript global environment. Just say "ECMAScript global
environments for dedicated workers must not _expose_ the
SharedWorkerGlobalScope interface." and vice versa. I think that should be
Posted from: 126.96.36.199
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:11.0a1) Gecko/20111209 Firefox/11.0a1
EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If
you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of
this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would
like the Editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would
like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please
add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and
text for the Tracker Issue; or you may create a Tracker Issue
yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this
Rationale: accepted WHATWG fix
Silvia - I don't see a new checkin in the Workers spec's CVS repository <http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/html5/workers/Overview.html>.
Was this bug fixed in some previous revision?
Oops, I'm sorry I got this mixed up as a bug of the HTML spec. Instead, it's
part of the WebAppsWG. It has been applied by Ian in
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15158 , so you might want to
check if that text has been pulled into the W3C spec.
Sorry for the confusion (again).
I checked the CVS log and this bug was fixed in r1.338 (9-Aug-2012) <http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/html5/workers/Overview.html.diff?r1=1.337;r2=1.338;f=h> (aka r/7226) so I'm changing it back to fixed.