This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 17852 - Self-Closing Input should be acknowledged for <input> in Tree Construction "In Table" Insertion Mode
Summary: Self-Closing Input should be acknowledged for <input> in Tree Construction "I...
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: WHATWG
Classification: Unclassified
Component: HTML (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Other other
: P3 normal
Target Milestone: Unsorted
Assignee: Ian 'Hixie' Hickson
QA Contact: contributor
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2012-07-18 07:03 UTC by contributor
Modified: 2012-09-27 23:29 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:

Attachments

Description contributor 2012-07-18 07:03:44 UTC 
This was was cloned from bug 16946 as part of operation convergence.
Originally filed: 2012-05-05 21:07:00 +0000
Original reporter: Raj Doshi <admin@tacosw.com>

================================================================================
 #0   Raj Doshi                                       2012-05-05 21:07:58 +0000 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the Tree Construction "In Table" insertion mode (section 8.2.5.4.9), there is a condition for "input" start tags.  Just like the "In Body" input case, I believe it should say "Acknowledge the token's self-closing flag, if it is set."  Currently, this is omitted under the "Otherwise" case, so using <input/> in that case results in an additional error.  The hidden case should be fine without that because it ultimately uses the "In Body" behavior.
================================================================================
Comment 1 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson 2012-09-27 23:27:21 UTC 
Yeah, I guess we should do that. Doesn't hugely matter since the element isn't conforming in that case anyway so you'll have errors coming out the wazoo, but there's no need to confuse matters.

Fixed.
Comment 2 contributor 2012-09-27 23:27:40 UTC 
Checked in as WHATWG revision r7417.
Check-in comment: Missed a (minor) case of handling the /> talisman.
http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=7416&to=7417
Comment 3 contributor 2012-09-27 23:29:26 UTC 
Checked in as WHATWG revision r7418.
Check-in comment: Ack for last checkin
http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=7417&to=7418