This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 17165 - Need to define processing model for style and link
Summary: Need to define processing model for style and link
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 14703
Alias: None
Product: WHATWG
Classification: Unclassified
Component: HTML (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Other other
: P3 normal
Target Milestone: Unsorted
Assignee: Ian 'Hixie' Hickson
QA Contact: contributor
URL: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2012-05-24 05:35 UTC by contributor
Modified: 2012-12-01 22:31 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:

Attachments

Description contributor 2012-05-24 05:35:13 UTC 
Specification: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/semantics.html
Multipage: http://www.whatwg.org/C#styling
Complete: http://www.whatwg.org/c#styling

Comment:
Need to define processing model for style and link

Posted from: 71.184.125.56 by bzbarsky@mit.edu
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:15.0) Gecko/15.0 Firefox/15.0a1
Comment 1 Boris Zbarsky 2012-05-24 05:36:33 UTC 
In particular, at what points are the stylesheets actually loaded/parsed respectively?  What happens if the DOM inside <style> is mutated?  What happens if the CSSOM is mutated and then attributes that affect the styling behavior (e.g. title, rel, media) are changed?

UAs seem to be somewhat inconsistent on all this stuff.
Comment 2 Boris Zbarsky 2012-05-24 05:37:33 UTC 
Also, how changes to rel and media interact with .disabled.
Comment 3 contributor 2012-07-18 17:36:29 UTC 
This bug was cloned to create bug 18187 as part of operation convergence.
Comment 4 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson 2012-09-20 21:41:15 UTC 
Glenn, this is going to need mostly to be specced in the CSSOM spec.
Comment 5 Glenn Adams 2012-09-21 00:43:36 UTC 
(In reply to comment #4)
> Glenn, this is going to need mostly to be specced in the CSSOM spec.

i'll go over this with Boris to attempt to determine which side of the line what should be specced, then create an upstream CSSOM bug for portions we conclude should be defined in CSSOM
Comment 6 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson 2012-12-01 22:31:14 UTC 
I think this is the same as bug 14703, but I'll copy some of the comments over.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 14703 ***