This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 16073 - The link goes to Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) Snapshot 2010 instead of Cascading Style Sheets Level 2 Revision 1
Summary: The link goes to Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) Snapshot 2010 instead of Cascad...
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: WHATWG
Classification: Unclassified
Component: HTML (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Other other
: P3 normal
Target Milestone: Unsorted
Assignee: Ian 'Hixie' Hickson
QA Contact: contributor
URL: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2012-02-22 09:32 UTC by contributor
Modified: 2012-07-26 05:50 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:

Attachments

Description contributor 2012-02-22 09:32:38 UTC 
Specification: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/references.html#references
Multipage: http://www.whatwg.org/C#refsCSS
Complete: http://www.whatwg.org/c#refsCSS

Comment:
The link goes to Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) Snapshot 2010 instead of
Cascading Style Sheets Level 2 Revision 1

Posted from: 114.43.115.130 by kennyluck@csail.mit.edu
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_7_2) AppleWebKit/534.51.22 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/5.1.1 Safari/534.51.22
Comment 1 Ms2ger 2012-03-03 20:33:02 UTC 
That seems correct.
Comment 2 Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu 2012-03-03 23:07:33 UTC 
(In reply to comment #1)
> That seems correct.

I am not sure how spec linking works but that document (CSS 2010) is highly unhelpful and potentially confusing in various places where [CSS] is used (e.g. when the spec refers to 'unicode-bidi', 'whitespace', 'width', 'height', etc.). The preferred fallback when the corresponding CSS modules are so outdated should be CSS2.1, not this mysterious 2010 document, I think.
Comment 3 Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu 2012-03-03 23:10:31 UTC 
Note that the reference title now says "Cascading Style Sheets Level 2 Revision 1" so there's an inconsistency anyway.
Comment 4 contributor 2012-07-18 17:13:11 UTC 
This bug was cloned to create bug 18083 as part of operation convergence.
Comment 5 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson 2012-07-26 05:49:42 UTC 
Silly me for assuming /TR/CSS would bring you to the latest version of CSS. I really should know better.
Comment 6 contributor 2012-07-26 05:50:56 UTC 
Checked in as WHATWG revision r7204.
Check-in comment: fix ref
http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=7203&to=7204