This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 15951 - <track> The UA-defined label should not be exposed in the DOM API. DOM API should see the empty string instead.
Summary: <track> The UA-defined label should not be exposed in the DOM API. DOM API sh...
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: WHATWG
Classification: Unclassified
Component: HTML (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Other other
: P3 normal
Target Milestone: Unsorted
Assignee: Ian 'Hixie' Hickson
QA Contact: contributor
URL: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2012-02-10 13:14 UTC by contributor
Modified: 2012-09-07 19:25 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:


Attachments

Description contributor 2012-02-10 13:14:34 UTC
Specification: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/the-video-element.html
Multipage: http://www.whatwg.org/C#dom-texttrack-label
Complete: http://www.whatwg.org/c#dom-texttrack-label

Comment:
The UA-defined label should not be exposed in the DOM API. DOM API should see
the empty string instead.

Posted from: 85.227.157.105 by simonp@opera.com
User agent: Opera/9.80 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7.2; U; en) Presto/2.10.229 Version/11.61
Comment 1 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson 2012-04-25 18:52:38 UTC
In principle I agree, but the idea here is that a scripted controller can expose the tracks the same way as the UA controller. Do we really want to require that scripted controllers implement all the label magic?
Comment 2 Simon Pieters 2012-04-25 19:19:36 UTC
I think sites using custom controls would want to implement their own magic, and using the empty string would provide them with a sane check for when they should use their own magic.
Comment 3 contributor 2012-06-27 21:23:29 UTC
Checked in as WHATWG revision r7149.
Check-in comment: Make TextTrack.label not expose the UA-specific label if one is being used.
http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=7148&to=7149
Comment 4 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson 2012-06-27 21:53:50 UTC
(reopened pending decision on what to do with bugs that affect the HTMLWG spec)
Comment 5 contributor 2012-07-18 17:51:45 UTC
This bug was cloned to create bug 18257 as part of operation convergence.
Comment 6 Silvia Pfeiffer 2012-09-07 19:25:39 UTC
(In reply to comment #4)
> (reopened pending decision on what to do with bugs that affect the HTMLWG spec)

Merged into HTMLWG spec https://github.com/w3c/html/commit/4886ebc76b0335ceb8e47d2fa8c10868fc6b0be0