Bug 15915 - [SER 3.0] Unspecified ==> absent
[SER 3.0] Unspecified ==> absent
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Serialization 3.0
Last Call drafts
PC All
: P2 minor
: ---
Assigned To: Henry Zongaro
Mailing list for public feedback on specs from XSL and XML Query WGs
:
Depends on:
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2012-02-06 16:31 UTC by Michael Kay
Modified: 2012-07-10 02:20 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Michael Kay 2012-02-06 16:31:58 UTC
In 3.1 list item 2 we read "otherwise, the setting of the parameter is unspecified". I think "unspecified" here means "absent" - that is, the effect is that no value has been supplied for the parameter. This is different from "unspecified" which is used in at least one other place to mean "implementation-dependent".
Comment 1 Henry Zongaro 2012-02-06 19:43:45 UTC
Thank you for catching that inconsistency.  If the working groups do not object, I will treat this editorially by making the following changes:

1. Replace item 2 in the numbered list in section 3.1 to read, "otherwise, the setting of the parameter is absent."

2. In the paragraph following the note in section 3.1, change the phrase, "any serialization parameters whose values remain unspecified after applying the mechanism" to "any serialization parameters whose values are absent after applying the mechanism"
Comment 2 Henry Zongaro 2012-07-10 02:20:05 UTC
This will be corrected in the next working draft of Serialization 3.0.