This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.
In 12.6., the template says "References" where it should say "Change Controller".
EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Rejected Change Description: no spec change Rationale: Assuming you mean section 16.10, this is incorrect per the relevant RFC.
(In reply to comment #1) > Rationale: Assuming you mean section 16.10, this is incorrect per the relevant > RFC. I said 12.6 and meant it. See URI: <http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#web-scheme-prefix> The text says: "References W3C" I agree that RFC 4395 wants a "References" entry, but it's described as Include full citations for all referenced documents. Registration templates for provisional registration may be included in an Internet Draft; when the documents expire or are approved for publication as an RFC, the registration will be updated. I don't see how saying "W3C" addresses this. The right thing to put here is the definition of the scheme (if there was one; but that's a separate issue).
Oh I don't use the W3C version, so using section numbers from that spec is just a waste of your time. EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Rejected Change Description: no spec change Rationale: The spec doesn't say what you say it does.
(In reply to comment #3) > Oh I don't use the W3C version, so using section numbers from that spec is just > a waste of your time. Not helpful. This is the W3C bug tracking system, after all. > EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are > satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If > you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please > reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML > Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest > title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue > yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: > http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html > > Status: Rejected > Change Description: no spec change > Rationale: The spec doesn't say what you say it does. I note that you actually *did* change the spec, so setting the resolution to "invalid" is really really misleading.