This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 15370 - WindowingUseCases19
Summary: WindowingUseCases19
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT
Classification: Unclassified
Component: XQuery 3.0 Use Cases (show other bugs)
Version: Member-only Editors Drafts
Hardware: PC All
: P2 normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jonathan Robie
QA Contact: Mailing list for public feedback on specs from XSL and XML Query WGs
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2011-12-30 22:06 UTC by Michael Kay
Modified: 2012-01-24 17:30 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:


Attachments

Description Michael Kay 2011-12-30 22:06:50 UTC
The expected results for this test do not copy the whitespace that is present in the input within the OrderRequest elements.

Perhaps it is intended that the source document should be schema-validated, in which case the rules for construction from a PSVI might well cause the whitespace text nodes to be stripped. The instance document cxml.xml contains an xsi:noNamespaceSchemaLocation attribute which might suggest that this was the intent. However (a) the schema document cxml.xsd is not supplied, and (b) no schema document is referenced in the relevant <environment> (WindowingUseCases07).
Comment 1 Matthias Brantner 2012-01-03 20:23:05 UTC
Before changing the expected results in the test suite, I would like to answer the question for the use case document first. I couldn't find any reference whether the results given in the use case document expect the data to be validated.

If the data is assumed to be validated, the use case document should mention this and also adapt the value of the date attribute from 2006-01-02T14:00:00-00:00 to 2006-01-02T14:00:00Z.
Comment 2 Andrew Eisenberg 2012-01-16 17:35:17 UTC
Bugzilla #11762 added some necessary parenthesis to this use case, which will be be reflected in our Use Cases document when next we publish it. I suggest that this test case reflect this change.
Comment 3 Jonathan Robie 2012-01-24 17:30:56 UTC
In the use cases document, we will change the value to 2006-01-02T14:00:00Z in the input, and explicitly state that schema validation is assumed.