Bug 15307 - [XHR] (editorial) the Extensibilty section suggest method prefixing like FooBar() instead of fooBar()
Summary: [XHR] (editorial) the Extensibilty section suggest method prefixing like FooB...
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: WebAppsWG
Classification: Unclassified
Component: XHR (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC All
: P2 normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Anne
QA Contact: public-webapps-bugzilla
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2011-12-22 01:39 UTC by Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu
Modified: 2011-12-22 09:54 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu 2011-12-22 01:39:37 UTC
Specification:
http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/xhr/raw-file/tip/Overview.html#extensibility

Comment:
If I am not missing something, this doesn't match common practice.
Comment 1 Anne 2011-12-22 09:39:59 UTC
Could you elaborate a little bit?
Comment 2 Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu 2011-12-22 09:49:00 UTC
Isn't mozXXX or webkitXXX more common? Or is the spec referring to constructor methods here (in that case, that doens't seem to be relevant in this spec unless it's a subclass of XMLHttpRequest or the other) ?
Comment 3 Anne 2011-12-22 09:54:37 UTC
Fair enough: http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/xhr/rev/ac2bf114fd20