This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 14289 - <track> should be clearer about which strings cue.alignment returns
Summary: <track> should be clearer about which strings cue.alignment returns
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: HTML WG
Classification: Unclassified
Component: HTML5 spec (show other bugs)
Version: unspecified
Hardware: Other other
: P3 normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Ian 'Hixie' Hickson
QA Contact: HTML WG Bugzilla archive list
URL: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/...
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2011-09-26 11:36 UTC by contributor
Modified: 2011-10-02 17:06 UTC (History)
7 users (show)

See Also:


Attachments

Description contributor 2011-09-26 11:36:17 UTC
Specification: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/complete/the-iframe-element.html
Multipage: http://www.whatwg.org/C#dom-texttrackcue-alignment
Complete: http://www.whatwg.org/c#dom-texttrackcue-alignment

Comment:
<track> should be clearer about which strings cue.alignment returns

Posted from: 88.131.66.80 by simonp@opera.com
User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_5_8) AppleWebKit/535.2 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/15.0.874.21 Safari/535.2
Comment 1 Silvia Pfeiffer 2011-09-26 13:05:11 UTC
Chipping in here, I've recently had some thoughts on the alignment values of WebVTT which are "start", "end" and "middle". These make sense when you just regard multi-line text rendering for a certain area and want the text to be aligned based on its directionality.

However, I've been seeing examples were text was right aligned along the shape of a person or other object because it made sense to be aligned there, independent of the directionality of the text.

So, my suggestion is to add "right" and "left" to the alignment values of WebVTT, too.
Comment 2 Ian 'Hixie' Hickson 2011-10-02 17:06:08 UTC
EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document:
   http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html

Status: Accepted
Change Description: see diff given below
Rationale: Concurred with reporter's comments.
Comment 3 contributor 2011-10-02 17:06:59 UTC
Checked in as WHATWG revision r6615.
Check-in comment: This was poorly defined, to say the least.
http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=6614&to=6615