This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.
Authors should be able to specify preferred direction and/or order for sequential navigation, even among things such as tables that would not normally have a tab order. Recommendation: Allow marking up any element with a reference to the logically next and/or previous elements, for use when those are not the next/previous elements in the source. We do not yet have a recommended method, but will be doing further discussion. For example, one potential method would be general attributes for next and previous such when a browser was implementing caret browsing and the caret moved beyond the end of a paragraph marked up with next="story5", that attribute would be a hint to the browser to move the caret to the element with id="story5" rather than to the element that follows the paragraph in the HTML source. Use case: Masahiko is reading a web page, and uses browser commands to move the text cursor to the next and previous paragraphs. In most cases this works fine because the suggested reading order is that in which elements occur in the HTML. However, when Masahiko is reading a document where CSS is used to reorder and reposition paragraphs on the screen, caret browsing in document order would seem to Masahiko to be a random order, and therefore very confusing and unusable.
There is such mechanism already: http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-ui/#keyboard http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-ui/#nav-up
mass-move component to LC1
EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Accepted Change Description: no spec change Rationale: already possible see comment 1