This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.
http://www.w3.org/International/2005/02/xq-xt-datamodel-review.html Comment: 4
On namespace-bindings accessors and namespace nodes In these sections you refer to URI in a rather colloquial way, e.g. "a set of prefix/URI pairs" (sec. 5.7) or "prefix, uri, parent" (sec. 6.4.1). Please refer to the definition of IRI (or anyURI, which is defined in terms of IRI) instead. Based on Martin's review, comment [30]
consensus of the i18n-core-wg, telecon 27 may 2005: approved by i18n-core-wg.
Adopted the solution accepted for 1350: adding the following text to the terminology section of the Data Model document: "Within this specification, the term URI refers to a Universal Resource Identifier as defined in RFC 3986 and extended in RFC 3987 with the new name IRI. The term URI has been retained in preference to IRI to avoid introducing new names for concepts such as 'Base URI' that are defined or referenced across the whole family of XML specifications." Please let us know if you find this unsatisfactory.
Closing bug in spite of no response from commenter after almost two years