This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 12688 - [XDM30] The type hierarchy diagram has old spec versions
Summary: [XDM30] The type hierarchy diagram has old spec versions
Alias: None
Product: XPath / XQuery / XSLT
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Data Model 3.0 (show other bugs)
Version: Working drafts
Hardware: All All
: P5 trivial
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jim Melton
QA Contact: Mailing list for public feedback on specs from XSL and XML Query WGs
Depends on:
Reported: 2011-05-18 21:33 UTC by Henry Zongaro
Modified: 2011-08-09 01:52 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:


Description Henry Zongaro 2011-05-18 21:33:13 UTC
The type hierarchy diagrams that appear in section 2.7.3 of XDM 3.0[1] and section 1.5 of F&O 3.0[2] still refer to XPath 2.1 and XQuery 1.1, rather than version 3.0 of both.

Also, now that Data Model has dropped namespace bindings in favor of namespace nodes, I think it would make sense for Part 1 of the type hierarchy diagram to include namespace nodes.

Comment 1 Jim Melton 2011-08-05 23:19:37 UTC
I have fixed the type hierarchy diagrams to properly reflect the language version 3.0 instead of 1.1 and 2.1.  Please have a look in the (member only) CVS files and confirm.  If you agree, please mark this bug CLOSED.
Comment 2 Henry Zongaro 2011-08-07 11:41:07 UTC
The language version looks correct.  However, namespace nodes are still missing from XPathTypeHierarchy-1-items.png and from the tabular form of the type hierarchy for nodes.
Comment 3 Jim Melton 2011-08-09 00:03:00 UTC
Sigh...I was so in awe of myself for fixing the language version numbers that I totally spaced out adding namespace nodes to the node part of the type hierarchy. I believe that I have done it properly now, although the fixes to the tabular presentation won't show until the documents have been re-built by their editors.

Consequently, I've once again marked the bug RESOLVED/FIXED in the eternal hope that I've actually accomplished that.  If you find that I have, please mark the bug CLOSED.  (Otherwise, REOPEN it and tell me what I missed.)  Thanks!
Comment 4 Henry Zongaro 2011-08-09 01:52:31 UTC
It's lovely!  Thanks.