This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 12238 - group is missing in the content of XML Representation of all model groups
Summary: group is missing in the content of XML Representation of all model groups
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 7031
Alias: None
Product: XML Schema
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Structures: XSD Part 1 (show other bugs)
Version: 1.1 only
Hardware: All All
: P2 normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: David Ezell
QA Contact: XML Schema comments list
URL:
Whiteboard:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2011-03-04 11:33 UTC by Andreas Meissl
Modified: 2011-03-05 00:22 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:


Attachments

Description Andreas Meissl 2011-03-04 11:33:38 UTC
In "3.8.2 XML Representation of Model Group Schema Components" the Content for "all" should also contain "group".

"Content: (annotation?, (element | any)*)"
should be changed to:
"Content: (annotation?, (element | any | group)*)" 

If not schema for schemas and the example at the beginning of "3.8 Model Groups" should be changed.
Comment 1 C. M. Sperberg-McQueen 2011-03-05 00:22:19 UTC
You are quite correct; thank you for pointing it out.

This appears to be the same point as is raised in comment 12 of bug 7031 (http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=7031#c12).  I do not now understand why the change to the XML syntax display failed to appear in the published draft, but the WG's internal copy of the document does now show the change, so I believe that the underlying cause, whatever it was, has now been fixed.  

I'm marking this issue as a duplicate of bug 7031, which will I believe cause it to be treated as having been resolved.  

If you, as the originator of this bug report, are content with this resolution, you need do nothing (except wait for a fresh publication of the document with the fix); if you are unsatisifed with it, please let us know.  If we don't hear from you in the next two weeks we will assume you are happy.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 7031 ***