Check that if we resolve all TAG comments we will answer Yes to all items 
in ICS.
1)      Not clear that SpecGL requires a completed ICS in order to claim 
conformance to SpecGL.  In Conformance Claim section, add bullet to 
include a completed ICS; Add to the example reference to the ICS  e.g., 
An ICS proforma is at <give URI>.  Clarify the you can claim conformance 
that this is one example of what the claim can look like it.  Need to move 
SpecGLs ICS from informative to normative.  Reword, in Conformance 
Criteria section last sentence to: If all the Requirements are checked as 
being satisfied, then conformance can be claimed as below. Converse is 
handled by statement that,  To conform to this SpecGL, all Requirements 
must be implemented.
2)      Keep definition of specification in the Scope.  Add definition to 
Glossary.
What is SpecGLs COP?  Technical Reports with strong focus on specifications.
3)      Not different.
4)      Changed Conformance Clause is simple to Conformance Model of the 
SpecGL is simple.
5)      Discussed earlier, under workflow mix.
6)      Make more explicit - State that no subdivision is warranted. Add 
positive statement regarding explaining why not.  We want to encourage 
people not to subdivide unless necessary, this seems to counter 
that.  Status quo is that you dont subdivide.  In 4.1 GP A add only when 
warranted.  Talk about cost of subdividing in the What does this mean.
7)      No extensibility mechanism is presented, although we allow it. Fine 
for others to add new requirements (functions) REJECT this.
8)      Error handling  not applicable for SpecGL.  Need to reflect that 
this is not applicable to WGAC, SpecGL, etc.
9)      No obsolete features.  Need to mention that SpecGL has no 
deprecation, obsolete, etc. in its conformance clause.
10)  Internal process for review  addressed earlier by earlier TAG comment
11)  Addressed by earlier TAG comment
ACTION: make above changes.
RESOLUTION agree with the TAG, except as Noted (7). Have reviewed ICS and 
taken appropriate actions (e.g., modified SpecGL) to ensure that all items 
result in Yes.

1) implemented
2) implemented
3) (N/A)
4) implemented
5) see relevant bug
6) implemented
7) rejected
8) implemented 
9) not needed anymore since 1st version are excluded of deprecation/obsolete
features declaration
10) N/A
11) N/A

(completed ICS is now part of bug 983, will published along with SpecGL)

setting version to LC in case of future use