This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.
From Tim Boland: I don't understand why the "rationales" are designated as "normative"..
"Normative content is the prescriptive part of the specification, whereas informative content is for informational purposes and assists in the understanding and use of the specification. Content includes all sorts of different forms not only descriptive prose, but illustrations, examples, use cases, formulae and other formalisms. .... Conformance of implementations is defined by and measured against normative content." I do not think the Rationales are testable; they aid in understanding of the specification, and therefore, should be informative, if one follows the Good Practice C mentioned previously. Also, it needs to be mentioned explicitly in Section 3 what it means to "meet a checkpoint" in Section 3. I thought it meant satisfying the success criteria associated with that checkpoint as prescribed by Section 3 (passing all the relevant tests associated with that success criteria?) Perhaps Section 3 material should be moved to before the Guidelines, since it mentions priorities and a reader might want to know this material before accessing the Guidelines, and conformance is an important subject that should be "up front"
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 1009 ***