This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.
In part 2, Section 3.3.9.2 (xs:time) asserts: "The ·lexical mapping· maps '00:00:00' and '24:00:00' to the same value, namely midnight (·hour· = 0 , ·minute· = 0 , ·second· = 0)." However, the lexical mapping given in function timeLexicalMap() does not appear to do this; it gives no mapping to a value when endOfDayFrag is used. Similarly for xs:dateTime.
(In reply to comment #0) > However, the lexical mapping given in function timeLexicalMap() does not appear > to do this; it gives no mapping to a value when endOfDayFrag is used. > > Similarly for xs:dateTime. It appears I screwed up--amazing no one caught it before. Will try to have a fix by next week's WG phone meeting. :-(
At the telcon on 2010-09-24 the WG decided: 1) to adopt an ammendment proposed in this email http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-schema-ig/2010Sep/0007.html, i.e. "D+1), 0, 0, 0," to "D), 24, 0, 0," 2) to recast the notes in Appendices E.3.5 and D.2.2, since special handling for EOD frag no longer forces values to zero (MSM). 3) remove the parentheses from these same notes and mark them in the usual way for notes. 4) adopt the following rewording of the text: LEX necessarily includes substrings that are instances of yearFrag, monthFrag, and dayFrags (below referred to as Y, MO, and D respectively); it also contains either instances of hourFrag, minuteFrag, and secondFrag (Y, MI, and S), or else an instance of endOfDayFrag; finally, it may optionally contain an instance of timezoneFrag (T).
The changes described in comment 2 have been made in the (member-accessible) status-quo version of the document; to reflect that fact, I'm marking this issue as resolved. [To the originator of the comment:] If you are content with the disposition of the comment, you can as originator close the issue to signal your contentment. If for some reason you are unhappy, please re-open the issue and explain what's wrong. If we don't hear from you in the next two weeks or so, we'll assume that you are happy with the outcome.