This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 10650 - minor editorial improvement : fundamental facets{ordering}
Summary: minor editorial improvement : fundamental facets{ordering}
Status: CLOSED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: XML Schema
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Datatypes: XSD Part 2 (show other bugs)
Version: 1.1 only
Hardware: All All
: P2 trivial
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: David Ezell
QA Contact: XML Schema comments list
URL: http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema11-2/
Whiteboard:
Keywords: decided
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2010-09-18 10:47 UTC by Mukul Gandhi
Modified: 2010-11-25 12:44 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:

Attachments

Description Mukul Gandhi 2010-09-18 10:47:27 UTC 
In the description at section 4.2.1 (ordered -> "fundamental facets") in XML Schema 1.1 data types spec, there's a paragraph:

<quote>
Mathematically, any set of values possesses least one trivial partial ordering, in which every value pair that is not equal is incomparable.
</quote>

Perhaps this could be improved as follows:
"Mathematically, any set of values possesses at-least one trivial partial ordering, in which every value pair that is not equal is incomparable."

I find word "at-least" better than "least" here.
Comment 1 David Ezell 2010-10-01 14:22:40 UTC 
at the telcon on 2010-09-24, the WG decided to change "least" to "at least"
Comment 2 C. M. Sperberg-McQueen 2010-11-25 00:38:13 UTC 
The change described has been made in the (member-accessible) status-quo version 
of the document; to reflect that fact, I'm marking this issue as resolved.

[To the originator of the comment:]  If you are content with the disposition of the 
comment, you can as originator close the issue to signal your contentment.  If 
for some reason you are unhappy, please re-open the issue and explain what's 
wrong.  If we don't hear from you in the next two weeks or so, we'll assume that 
you are happy with the outcome. 

Thank you for your observant and helpful suggestion.
Comment 3 Mukul Gandhi 2010-11-25 12:44:49 UTC 
(In reply to comment #2)
> The change described has been made in the (member-accessible) status-quo
> version 
> of the document; to reflect that fact, I'm marking this issue as resolved.
> 
> [To the originator of the comment:]  If you are content with the disposition of
> the 
> comment, you can as originator close the issue to signal your contentment.  If 
> for some reason you are unhappy, please re-open the issue and explain what's 
> wrong.  If we don't hear from you in the next two weeks or so, we'll assume
> that 
> you are happy with the outcome. 
> 
> Thank you for your observant and helpful suggestion.

I trust that this change was done. I'm marking this issue closed.

Thanks.