This is an archived snapshot of W3C's public bugzilla bug tracker, decommissioned in April 2019. Please see the home page for more details.

Bug 3287 - Clarity of language in the abstract
Summary: Clarity of language in the abstract
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Alias: None
Product: ITS
Classification: Unclassified
Component: ITS tagset (show other bugs)
Version: LastCall
Hardware: All All
: P2 normal
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Felix Sasaki
QA Contact: Felix Sasaki
URL: http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-its-2006...
Whiteboard:
Keywords: editorial
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-05-16 06:56 UTC by Karl Dubost
Modified: 2006-07-25 07:21 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:


Attachments

Description Karl Dubost 2006-05-16 06:56:34 UTC
[[[
Abstract

This document defines data categories and their implementation as a set of elements and attributes called the Internationalization Tag Set (ITS). ITS is designed to be used with schemas to support the internationalization and localization of schemas and documents. An implementation is provided for three schema languages: XML DTD, XML Schema and RELAX NG. The document provides examples of how ITS can be used with existing vocabularies. Feedback is especially appreciated on the general design of ITS, and on the design of the individual data categories.]]]


I suggest to rewrite a bit this introduction.

Internationlization Tag Set (ITS) defines data categories and their implementation as a set of elements and attributes. ITS is designed to be used with schemas to support the internationalization and localization of schemas and documents. Three implementations (XML DTD, XML Schema and RELAX NG) are provided and examples show how ITS can be used with existing vocabularies.

Remove the part about the feedback, the status section is here for that.
Comment 1 Felix Sasaki 2006-05-16 09:29:02 UTC
(In reply to comment #0)
> [[[
> Abstract
> 
> This document defines data categories and their implementation as a set of
> elements and attributes called the Internationalization Tag Set (ITS). ITS is
> designed to be used with schemas to support the internationalization and
> localization of schemas and documents. An implementation is provided for three
> schema languages: XML DTD, XML Schema and RELAX NG. The document provides
> examples of how ITS can be used with existing vocabularies. Feedback is
> especially appreciated on the general design of ITS, and on the design of the
> individual data categories.]]]
> 
> 
> I suggest to rewrite a bit this introduction.
> 
> Internationlization Tag Set (ITS) defines data categories and their
> implementation as a set of elements and attributes. ITS is designed to be used
> with schemas to support the internationalization and localization of schemas
> and documents. Three implementations (XML DTD, XML Schema and RELAX NG) are
> provided and examples show how ITS can be used with existing vocabularies.
> 
> Remove the part about the feedback, the status section is here for that.
> 
Many thanks for the comment, Karl! In the last call draft (to be published soon), see
http://www.w3.org/International/its/itstagset/itstagset-diff-20060414.html ,
we already changed the section. Are you o.k. with that?
Comment 2 Felix Sasaki 2006-07-13 12:52:04 UTC
This is a response of the ITS working group.
The ITS working group has rewritten the introduction in the last call
working draft. Does this new version reply to your concerns? If we don't
here from you within 2 weeks, we will regard the issue as closed.
Regards, Felix Sasaki.
Comment 3 Karl Dubost 2006-07-24 01:26:37 UTC
I guess this is the last version?
http://www.w3.org/International/its/itstagset/itstagset.html#introduction

Yes my concerns are addressed except one. Do not start both in abstract and introduction with "this document". It's a common mistake from W3C editors, we already know that it's about this document ;) look at my example when I had started to rewrite the intro. :)

for the rest thanks.
Comment 4 Felix Sasaki 2006-07-24 10:40:34 UTC
(In reply to comment #3)
> I guess this is the last version?
> http://www.w3.org/International/its/itstagset/itstagset.html#introduction
> 
> Yes my concerns are addressed except one. Do not start both in abstract and
> introduction with "this document". It's a common mistake from W3C editors, we
> already know that it's about this document ;) look at my example when I had
> started to rewrite the intro. :)
> 
> for the rest thanks.
> 
Many thanks, Karl. We will delete "this document" :)

Felix
Edstatus: pending
Comment 5 Felix Sasaki 2006-07-25 07:21:02 UTC
Action: editors to make the change.