ISSUE-426: MHP vs W3C reference for PNG

MHP vs W3C reference for PNG

Raised by:
Glenn Adams
Opened on:
The phrase "complete image" should simply read "image". If it conforms to the cited PNG coding, then it is "complete".

Why is the [MHP] specification referenced for the PNG coding when the W3C publishes a spec at [1]? If the MHP version is to be used, then an explanation is needed about the divergence this may produce. Note that most presentation engines are not going to use the MHP profile of PNG unless they are part of an MHP implementation, which we certainly cannot assume here.

Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. {minutes} TTWG Meeting 2015-10-15 (from on 2015-10-15)
  2. {agenda} TTWG Meeting 2015-10-15 (from on 2015-10-14)
  3. RE: {agenda} TTWG Meeting 2015-10-08 (from on 2015-10-08)
  4. {agenda} TTWG Meeting 2015-10-08 (from on 2015-10-07)
  5. {agenda} TTWG Meeting 2015-10-01 (from on 2015-10-01)
  6. {agenda} TTWG Meeting 2015-09-24 (from on 2015-09-23)
  7. Update re: outstanding IMSC1 issues (from on 2015-09-21)
  8. ISSUE-426: MHP vs W3C reference for PNG [TTML IMSC 1.0] (from on 2015-09-21)

Related notes:

Replaced MHP reference with direct PNG reference: no meaningful divergence found.

Pierre-Anthony Lemieux, 21 Sep 2015, 21:24:47

Display change log ATOM feed

David Singer <>, Nigel Megitt <>, Chairs, Thierry Michel <>, Philippe Le H├ęgaret <>, Atsushi Shimono <>, Staff Contacts
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <>.
$Id: 426.html,v 1.1 2019/11/12 10:07:47 carcone Exp $