RE: Correction about VoiceXML

Thank you for pointing out this error. Just to clarify, the VoiceXML Forum is different from the W3C Voice Browser Working Group, which actually published the VoiceXML spec. Having said that, the Voice Browser Working Group is also closed (https://www.w3.org/Voice/). However, reporting errors to the public mailing list, as you have done, is exactly the right thing to do, since the mailing list serves as a repository for keeping track of any errors found in the Voice Browser specs.

 

From: dirk.schnelle@jvoicexml.org <dirk.schnelle@jvoicexml.org> 
Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2022 16:33
To: 张麟 <zhanglintc623@gmail.com>
Cc: www-voice@w3.org
Subject: Re: Correction about VoiceXML

 

Thank you.

 

Yes, you are correct, but the VoicXML forum stopped working, so I would not expect a correction.

 

https://www.globenewswire.com/en/news-release/2022/05/31/2453162/0/en/VoiceXML-Forum-Dissolves-After-Successful-Completion-of-its-Mission.html

 

Dirk

 

 

Am 09.11.2022 10:39 schrieb 张麟 <zhanglintc623@gmail.com <mailto:zhanglintc623@gmail.com> >:

Hi, there:

 

I’m reading VoiceXML:  <https://www.w3.org/TR/voicexml20/> https://www.w3.org/TR/voicexml20/.

 

In section “2.1.5 Mixed Initiative Forms”, there is such a sentence:

One common authoring tyle combines an <initial> element that prompts for a general response with <field> elements that prompt for specific information.

 

I think the “tyle” here is not correct.

Maybe it should be “style”?

 

 

Best regards

ZhangLin