Meeting minutes
New Business
Sheri_B-H: I will be preenting on 16th
Github Issue #374 Removing Disability Inclusion From The Document
<Sheri_B-H> Sheri_B-H: on the AI-related additions, and Angela young will be helping me
<Fazio> w3c/
<gb> Issue 374 Removing Disability Inclusion From The Document (by Helixopp)
Fazio: A disability inclusion roadmap that drives ICT accessibility is in place - given
Sheri_B-H: Personnel roadmap that drives ICT accessibility is in place - proposed
Mark_Miller: Roadmap that drives ICT accessibility is in place - proposed?
<Fazio> w3c/
<Sheri_B-H> w3c/
Sheri_B-H: Personnel relevant roadmap that drives ICT accessibility is in place - proposed = 4 votes
The overall organizational approach to evaluating recruitment, retention, advancement, and engagement is defined - Given
Sheri_B-H: The overall organizational approach related to disability to evaluating recruitment, retention, advancement, and engagement is defined - proposed
<Sheri_B-H> The overall organizational approach to evaluating accessibility in recruitment, retention, advancement, and engagement is defined
jlkine: evaluating accessibility in recruitment, ....
Fazio: I am not understanding
Sheri_B-H: Evaluating is confusing
Sheri_B-H: The overall organizational approach to evaluating accessibility in recruitment, retention, advancement, and engagement is defined - this is the sentence
Process integration for maturing disability inclusion efforts for ICT accessibility is in progress but not consistently implemented across the organization - given
<Fazio> Process integration for maturing **disability inclusion** efforts for ICT accessibility is in progress but not consistently implemented across the organization
<Sheri_B-H> old
<Sheri_B-H> Process integration for maturing disability inclusion efforts for ICT accessibility is in progress but not consistently implemented across the organization
<Sheri_B-H> new
<Sheri_B-H> Process integration for maturing ICT accessibility efforts related to personnel is in progress but not consistently implemented across the organization
<Neha> +1
old language: Organization-wide, disability inclusion staffing efforts are well-defined, evaluated, remediated, and integrated with ICT accessibility efforts and goals across the organization
proposed language: Organization-wide, staffing efforts are well-defined, evaluated, remediated, and integrated with ICT accessibility efforts and goals across the organization
<Sheri_B-H> Organization-wide staffing efforts are well-defined, evaluated, remediated, and integrated with ICT accessibility efforts and goals across the organization
<Sheri_B-H> Organization-wide disability-related staffing efforts are integrated with ICT accessibility efforts and goals across the organization
proposed language: Organization-wide disability-related staffing efforts are integrated with ICT accessibility efforts and goals across the organization
<Sheri_B-H> Disability-related staffing efforts are well-defined, evaluated, remediated, and integrated with ICT accessibility efforts and goals across the organization
proposed language: Disability-related staffing efforts are integrated with ICT accessibility efforts and goals across the organization
<Fazio> Employees with disabilities hold critical decision-making positions and are **included** in all areas of the organization to drive accessibility in every facet of the business
Old: Employees with disabilities hold critical decision-making positions and are included in all areas of the organization to drive accessibility in every facet of the business
<Sheri_B-H> Employees with disabilities hold critical decision-making positions in all areas of the organization to drive accessibility in every facet of the business
<Sheri_B-H> Employees with disabilities are involved with developing products
old language: Employees with disabilities are leveraged to audit accessibility
Employees with disabilities are leveraged for product development
Employees with disabilities are leveraged for the development of accessible services.
Sheri_B-H: can we combine all these sentences?
Fazio: I thinkn they are present independantly so let us keep them separate
Github Issue #348 Oversight missing - metrics addition
<Fazio> w3c/
<gb> Issue 348 Oversight missing (by iadawn)
JeffAdams-UN: I didn't get into granularity of it, explaining some..
JeffAdams-UN - all the KPIs can be documented.
Fazio: should this be sectioned or overall one proof point?
JeffAdams-UN: We are considering how it folds in to Goverence, additional proof points or get added to one existing
Sheri_B-H: I think it makes sence to add into Goverence
Fazio: How shpuld we integrate it?
w3c/
<gb> Issue 341 Missing governance/policy (by iadawn)
Sheri_B-H: List is good but lots of them is already mentioned in another dimensions
Sheri_B-H: We need to look at this if it is covered in other dimensions or not
Fazio: some people are saying that we are not telling people how to implement the matrix
Sheri_B-H: which is fine but we have all KPIs mentioned
Mark_Miller: Question is correct but how can we guide them?
JeffAdams-UN: At least a starting point for KPIs where to start from
Sheri_B-H: We hvae to build a model which can be deliverd
Mark_Miller: Some KPIs are not relatable but we have to pick correct one
Sheri_B-H: It is an implementation problem
Sheri_B-H: We can massage Jeff's text and add it in appendix
It should go as a new section after use cases
A.3 - Sheri_B-H
<CharlesL1> in the last issue #374 we did not cover the last "disability and Inclusion" reference: Use Case FiveAn NGO wants to determine which areas it should address to improve internal disability inclusion in the next fiscal year.