Meeting minutes
Agenda Review & Announcements
TPAC 2026
Breakout proposals
<matatk> https://
matatk 2 break out topics are proposed
<matatk> 1. Accessibility and Privacy - <https://
<matatk> 2. What does good AI training look like from an accessibility perspective? - <https://
matatk: some comments are added from RQTF, please add your comments as well
Fazio: We can also propose for maturity model as TPAC is in Europe this time
matatk: let us see how many slots are available as we discussed this in RQTF group as well
matatk: Funding support to attend (deadline 31st)
New charters review
https://
<Roy_Ruoxi> w3c/
Roy_Ruoxi: This year we have mini workshop regarding AI and society
matatk: if you are interested in preparing a 5-minute presentation about the positive or negative impact of GenAI on society
<matatk> TPAC website: https://
<matatk> Participation info: https://
<matatk> That last page links to the mini workshops
https://
Browser Testing and Tools Working Group Charter
<matatk> w3c/
matatk: ARIA group is interested in taking it up
janina: I am just concerned about accessibility testing, we have to scope it accurately
<matatk> https://
matatk: AT driver topic is being discussed in the URL added above
PaulG: I read about a lot of experiments of AT drivers and scripting for MacOS but they ahd to drop it
Roy_Ruoxi: They will progress with this work from editors side in the next year
matatk: are we okay with change happening at the charter?
janina: Do we have a language change mention somewhere?
matatk: AT driver is not there anymore
matatk: I dont see a reason why this has been dropped
matatk: we can ask for the reason
<Roy_Ruoxi> w3c/
janina: Is it mentioned explicitly that AT driver is moving from browser to aria?
matatk: only comment is mentioned ARIA is ready to take it up
matatk: We can not tell a group to work on something
janina: We have to document it explicitly that ARIA is taking up the development of AT drivers
matatk: Safari has done work to support it, they are waiting to go ahead
matatk: I will add a comment that given the ARIA is taking it up, we are okay with it
Spec review requests
<matatk> - 2026-07-14: Digital Credentials
<matatk> - 2026-07-29: Attribution Level 1
<matatk> - 2026-07-31: [CSS Image Animation Module Level 1]
<matatk> w3c/
matatk: PaulG has added comment of related semantics
matatk: I will add a comment and then propose it
CSS Image Animation Module Level 1 and wider concerns
<matatk> Giving users control over motion - w3ctag/
matatk: Web platforms gaps mentioned
matatk: It has a review all kinds of motion related elements
matatk: There are four different use cases and requirements - no motion, less motion, more time to process the motion, to pause the motion
<Neha> +1 PaulG
matatk: these CSS features on and off feature is adding a risk of finger printing and raising concern for privacy
matatk: so proposal is also about how much user can control
marcelo: dark mode is also situational setting depending on the darkness of the atmosphere
fazio: It is also sustainibility and consuming less battery
matatk: weather we can setup a meeting to discuss related to this